Learning to fly fast in slow weather

The weather that we experienced in Klix last year was good strong weather. I think it might have been unusual for Europe. Turns and I were certainly not prepared for the sort of weather we have had to fly in this year. It has been difficult weather, but apparently typical of Europe. The way we have to think in Australia to go fast will certainly get you into trouble here or put you on the ground. The way you have to think here to go fast would make you uncompetitive in Australia.

Being low

We have spent most of the time on nearly all our tasks below 4000'. Our working height band has usually been between 1500' and 3500'. Below 1500' there is a good chance that you will not be able to climb back up again even if you do manage to find a thermal. It takes a bit to get used to being so close to the ground and having to keep an eye out to avoid getting into a position where a safe outlanding is not possible.

Power stations and windmills can look very big from 1500'. A large chateau surrounded by a mote was a pretty sight at 1200' on Day 4, but I would prefer to do my sight-seeing from the ground.

Staying high

To fly fast at home you need to be disciplined about rejecting thermals that are not strong enough for the day or leaving a climb when the rate of climb drops back. At home I am always thinking of my height band and fly a speed and choose thermals accordingly.

Height bands and being choosey about thermals goes out the window when you are most the time below 4000' and in weather that is rapidly changing. The objective is to stay high us much as possible jumping from lift area to lift area.

If the jump is too big, a diversion is required. We rarely divert more than 30 degrees off track at home. It is common in this weather to divert 90 degrees or even turn back to get height. Pushing on into a blue hole hoping to pick up a bit here and there to get you across does not work -- you have to get the height before continuing.

Diverting

Diverting is a lot more than heading off track a bit to follow a street for a while. On one day I was with a small gaggle faced with a large wet area ahead that looked dead and we diverted 90 degrees and then turned back a few kilometres to finally find a climb that enabled us to get high enough to jump the damp patch (so named by the Brits). If I were on my own, I would have seriously been wondering if I was making a mistake by turning back.

On another day when only 3 from our class made it back home, 2 had made a huge diversion to put themselves in a position on an AAT to avoid upper level cloud which the rest of us did not notice was forming until it was too late.

Changing gears

At home we look along the track a long way ahead -- often 100km or more. Once the day has started, it stays much the same for the rest of the day unless a new air mass moves in, which is often marked by a change in clouds. There is usually warning that the thermal activity ahead is different.

In Europe the weather is very unstable most of the time and changes rapidly with little warning. If the day is looking perfect at the time of launch there is reason to be concerned about overdevelopment. Sections of the task can overdevelop quickly before you have a chance to divert around the area. The sky can look great 10-20km ahead but be hard to stay up in where you are.

The trick is to be thinking of changing gears all the time. You have to take every chance there is to push the nose down and increase the speed or to discard a weak climb for a promising looking climb ahead if you have the height and the confidence that you will not end up low. When the height is disappearing, you need to back off again, slow down, maybe take weak lift, search for bits of lift and maybe divert for a climb.

Parking

The ground here is very very wet, even at the end of summer. There is a lot of moisture in the air and as a result, there are cumulous clouds on most days. These cumulous sometimes turn out to be "water sacs" that linger on well after the thermal has finished.

If the heating is slowed or cut off by upper level cloud the cumulous quickly disappear, but quickly appear again if a bit of heating gets through. The day can look completely cactus with the lift almost completely gone with a short time -- maybe 15 minutes -- in the same amount of time the cumulus could be beginning to form again.

When things start to look bleak, the objective is to stay alive for as long as possible waiting for a change. This might mean sitting in zero lift for 15-30 minutes. Continuing on is likely to lead to an outlanding.

There is a bit of luck or possibly bad luck in all this, because you can be at the top or bottom of your height band when the weather makes it change with little warning. If you are at the bottom, it is a battle to keep from landing out.

It is very rare in Australia to stop in zero or even very weak lift to wait for conditions to improve - once the day dies it is usually the end of the task and an attempt at getting maximum distance is made.

Picking the optimum time to start

The rapidly changing weather does have a cyclical pattern. It is not easy to pick this on task, but is quite observable pre-start. This is one of the key factors to consider when timing the start.

Height, position and the gaggle are major considerations, but it can be an advantage to head off at the start of an up cycle. In Australia, height, position and the gaggle are key considerations and the other is picking the latest time you can leave to get the greatest convection height at the start and the best part of the day on task.

At home the convection height increases over time with temperature quite a lot. Here, there is little increase in convection height once the day is high enough to launch. The finish of thermal activity for the day can be rapid, so getting home before the thermals begin to die is a high priority, but leaving before the gaggle can put you in last place on the scoreboard. The best time to leave is not an easy decision to make.

Final Glide

At home I err on the conservative side for final glide and I am happy to burn off an extra 500' in the last 15-10km. It is easy to lose 500' with strong lift and sink and a final glide distance of 50-60km. Here there is not strong lift or sink and convection height is so low that we pick up final glide quite close to home - about 30km out. Leaving the last climb with only 100' or no extra height instead of 500' saves a couple of minutes considering the time it takes to climb in weak lift and it is not very risky since there is not much sink around and the distance home is so short.

Back